Участник:ЗарегалсяДабыСделатьПравкуСтатьи/Юзербоксы/Слушает нойз: различия между версиями
Содержимое удалено Содержимое добавлено
м →Further reading: категоризация |
м →Reviews: обновление |
||
Строка 26:
==Reviews==
The doctrine of adverse possession was reviewed in publications such as "''A Critique of the Doctrine of Adverse Possession''", "''The effect of adverse possession on part of a registered title land parcel''" and "''Adverse possession of Torrens land: Parliamentary inquiry strays out of bounds''". The first article states that the "application of adverse possession in Australia is not morally justifiable." The second represents "an investigation of the effect of adverse possession upon the land market." The authors of the third article think that "the 1979 NSW reforms, being based on adverse possession, were unnecessarily clumsy."
# {{cite journal |last1=Teo |first1=Hong Yin |date=2008 |title=A Critique of the Doctrine of Adverse Possession |url=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.611.8561&rep=rep1&type=pdf |journal=Political Science |page=128 |doi= |access-date=}} — критика.
# {{cite journal |last1=Park |first1=Malcolm |date=January 2003 |title=The effect of adverse possession on part of a registered title land parcel |url=https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/38807/65932_00000328_01_Park.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |journal= |volume= |issue= |pages= |doi= |access-date=}} — заюзаю в разделе с обзорами.
| |||